Mark J. Mueller v. James H. Davis, Individually, James H. Davis D/B/A J.D. Minerals, and JDMI, LLC
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-14-00100-CV
MARK J. MUELLER, Appellant
V.
JAMES H. DAVIS, INDIVIDUALLY, JAMES H. DAVIS D/B/A J.D. MINERALS, AND JDMI, LLC, Appellees
On Appeal from the 71st District Court Harrison County, Texas Trial Court No. 11-0858
Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. ORDER Our review of the clerk’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as
that phrase is defined in Rule 9.9 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P.
9.9(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, passport number, social security
number, tax identification number or similar government-issued personal identification number.”
TEX. R. APP. P. 9.9(a)(1). Rule 9.9(b) states, “Unless the inclusion of sensitive data is specifically
required by statute, court rule, or administrative regulation, an electronic or paper document
containing sensitive data may not be filed with a court unless the sensitive data is redacted.” TEX.
R. APP. P. 9.9(b).
Therefore, because the clerk’s record fails to protect sensitive data, we order the clerk of
this Court or her appointee, pursuant to the inherent power of this Court, to seal the electronically
filed clerk’s record in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: October 26, 2015
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mark J. Mueller v. James H. Davis, Individually, James H. Davis D/B/A J.D. Minerals, and JDMI, LLC (Mark J. Mueller v. James H. Davis, Individually, James H. Davis D/B/A J.D. Minerals, and JDMI, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.