Mark J. Mueller v. James H. Davis, Individually, James H. Davis D/B/A J.D. Minerals, and JDMI, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 2, 2015
Docket06-14-00100-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Mark J. Mueller v. James H. Davis, Individually, James H. Davis D/B/A J.D. Minerals, and JDMI, LLC (Mark J. Mueller v. James H. Davis, Individually, James H. Davis D/B/A J.D. Minerals, and JDMI, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mark J. Mueller v. James H. Davis, Individually, James H. Davis D/B/A J.D. Minerals, and JDMI, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00100-CV

MARK J. MUELLER, Appellant

V.

JAMES H. DAVIS, INDIVIDUALLY, JAMES H. DAVIS D/B/A J.D. MINERALS, AND JDMI, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 71st District Court Harrison County, Texas Trial Court No. 11-0858

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. ORDER The appellant, Mark J. Mueller, has filed a second motion to extend the deadline for filing

his brief in this matter. The brief was originally due April 30, 2015, and is currently due June 1,

2015, after Mueller’s first motion seeking an extension was granted.

In his motion, counsel does not provide the Court with a reasonable explanation of the need

for an extension of time. This Court interprets Rule 10.5(b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure as requiring counsel to provide specific information to justify a requested extension,

including the cause numbers of cases in which other briefs were filed; the dates they were filed;

the dates, cause numbers, and courts of matters scheduled for trial; the exact dates of trial (if

known); the expected duration of trial; etc. Broad, general statements do not provide the required

facts and are not adequate to meet the requirements of the Rule. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(2).

All future motions to extend time must contain case-specific information adequate to

justify the request, or they will be denied.

In this instance, we grant Mueller’s motion and extend the deadline for filing his brief by

fifteen days, making the brief now due June 16, 2015. Absent extraordinary circumstances, further

requests for extensions of time will not be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: June 2, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mark J. Mueller v. James H. Davis, Individually, James H. Davis D/B/A J.D. Minerals, and JDMI, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-j-mueller-v-james-h-davis-individually-james--texapp-2015.