Mark J. Hammett v. Times-Herald, Inc., a Body Corporate, Also Known as Washington Times-Herald, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Mark J. Hammett v. Times-Herald, Inc., a Body Corporate, Also Known as Washington Times-Herald, Inc.

227 F.2d 328

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 14, 1955·No. 7066_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal in a libel case based on a newspaper article ridiculing a brochure circulated by a candidate for pub-lice office in which he highly recommended himself to the voters. The case was submitted to a jury in a fair and impartial charge to which no exception was taken. Certain instructions requested were not given, but the law was fairly covered in the general charge. There were no errors in the admission or rejection of testimony that are worthy of consideration. If there was any error in the trial of the case, it was in not directing a verdict for defendant; for the ridiculing of the self laudatory brochure did not exceed fair comment and there was nothing in the concluding line of the article “Anybody like to go with him steady?” which justifies the construction that it charged homosexuality by innuendo. Contention to that effect is frivolous.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal in a libel case based on a newspaper article ridiculing a brochure circulated by a candidate for pub-lice office in which he highly recommended himself to the voters. The case was submitted to a jury in a fair and impartial charge to which no exception was taken. Certain instructions requested were not given, but the law was fairly covered in the general charge. There were no errors in the admission or rejection of testimony that are worthy of consideration. If there was any error in the trial of the case, it was in not directing a verdict for defendant; for the ridiculing of the self laudatory brochure did not exceed fair comment and there was nothing in the concluding line of the article “Anybody like to go with him steady?” which justifies the construction that it charged homosexuality by innuendo. Contention to that effect is frivolous.

Affirmed.

Mark J. Hammett v. Times-Herald, Inc., a Body Corporate, Also Known as Washington Times-Herald, Inc., 227 F.2d 328 (4th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

227 F.2d 328 (Mark J. Hammett v. Times-Herald, Inc., a Body Corporate, Also Known as Washington Times-Herald, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related