Mark Haas v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Inc.
This text of 827 F.2d 769 (Mark Haas v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Mark HAAS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
E. I. DuPONT de NEMOURS AND COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 86-6093
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
August 26, 1987.
Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, KEITH, Circuit Judge, and DOWD*, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff-appellant Mark Haas appeals the summary judgment order entered in this diversity action by the Honorable Thomas A. Ballantine, Jr., United States District Judge, Western District of Kentucky. Appellant claims that defendant DuPont wrongfully discharged him and injured him further by the torts of false light and defamation.
After a thorough review of the briefs, record and oral argument, we hereby AFFIRM the order of the district court for the reasons stated in Judge Ballantine's accompanying memorandum of September 25, 1986.
Honorable David D. Dowd, Jr., United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
827 F.2d 769, 1987 WL 44564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-haas-v-e-i-dupont-de-nemours-and-company-inc-ca6-1987.