Mark F. Baughn v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 25, 2018·No. 18-3277·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D18-3277

MARK F. BAUGHN, Petitioner, v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

September 25, 2018

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 2005).

WOLF, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Robert I. Barrar of Robert I. Barrar P.A., Miami, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mark F. Baughn v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Mark F. Baughn v. State of Florida (Mark F. Baughn v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ratliff v. State
914 So. 2d 938 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)