Mark Eugene Engle v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 12, 2015·No. 06-14-00239-CR·Published

Opinion

/\/O,' 'O4p /"/ DO/ZS? CK F11_EDstS

The CO ucrt C~‘Ap¥.;=e T}_F\":`. C:\.,E:DN SixthD '''''

--- A~1\1111'1 1 2 2015»_~

5400(9 <3§9 lexng 1111 121115 5 1101 ___741 1499 /\ vi l xar%<31*13, 23 2133 M :2§¥ me §§ 40 Co_¢) 1< 393-12 021/3111 44954( _E\_/0079219_ E 4 />_0 A/)|/)ea,/,<

0:[;1_0_ :99949_:_095 z €_ 4/\€005`11/10,

:;_7?19 §4011010014)4 91]9§_~4/992903§_ 501}04_ 411/554

_ /\/OLJ 5'\[091'1_4_€ _ pe4491/0$4 _/9952495_ 92199£21 9_/€"_,959\1/1_ 94999 0\/9_5'4 __ 904 921: 211)_111.1 019/409959:7 _ 91:1/93

24/411_1_5§ %Wf 201/149 €>/LLecu/`M _4:7:_9 319 429/49 44028499 l 5 9 _1/~1 599 1059 . 66%04: 549*/_ ‘/Cgo}:>`§@%e /9;09<,’_ zu/P/SO:>@ 14 /)/,:://01>49

/§1/1){:91{1)1/@9 _,992:93@_<3 313 1300149 001125995 410123 %_~@9 l 0

§c)l u'){\w f 005049_59}91/1_ 020191_/0949§4€_/_’1/1 ¢4102)4

_ :4_ 9 909_ 941 2'6>[_ //l)949 1 2";:1“1112122111_12”2:; 211 2529

991£'€9€905_1/0{ 32 749 1:0_1»1149499 0504 _014 _9

999 _(,5 9 _99_ 9_____9___9 99 1

_i_»

§ /\io fecov`ci_ p_v_~@\/i/»i'@¢/ ~£m)w]_ (>_ ii6&i£i»_4.$__

:_L` ,

_ _D l_ \i_)_ 1 @_ _v:zi msiecwi \ _ _ \Me/xg O>V\/:\LJ aj 14() OZx/`*i\i~eé<:/o vio_>/_)Zc§i~€_éi_@ i_i_ _V`es_r/\l M::V\_

_ _€A/_`WO_V:S_ ' 3/ /iv/s_/o_ 1/_`)L_ il_£d §_/§_ie/_/z$_iz_ Qx(e_f:_'- ~ _ x/`UQAi_a/i( m_ _xm_$_e Com,¢>a}n“is @___\P_L\bs_ ._ __£s§_d~e_ _§_<2_~¢’ ,i\p,)@v\@i)>c Sio N‘L oji_ __ ML)_S_ , ¢*0(0 l§’OQ_U C_K__Aio_xzz_ _w_?<¢i\ }Zoxiwu _\Aiv +_Q:P_Exmfof_o¥ ~M\e 304/me 14 c)wl )4_ n./)Q Liw£i_v:é_i_d J_€_§_o_m_ \[/_i\¢e__i::fiowlv;

__ _O>_Oc)_ci_ Cm)$»& 4 _r/` &1/14£ rejd_esi_€d/ K~Q/ixearm //;1 /~e_/Qu//_’A_ _M/ z/c/r/ §i)iw O_//z)/Q_V\ _i_¢/z)_w_{_ %<> E.)CMM 149 w/LL/ '¢ko$@ /x/O pm/g_¢v_i_ ayse__/_

_i<)r~

cpi iad QMJ_ 60_4£[1/_££02/1$_ ci _[__ owe iv _\ii_L€_ iiol/lomiie_zdcixm/z/ Eea_aoz»w r- ¢iw_

_ vawwe/Q§’/Uu i/QQN_ eL__.

_W'\i/i'\er` /'O_)/L___ _ _e _ e_C.’_Q//O¢_d_/om/ @v//M@L

._ Wla§i &&$ 6_614_ ___&/év[___m_w1_¢i1€_f_ej;@_/a/M _b_€__ M 7)/§:%£0:_>[;!1¢¢0¢#1@7_5//£_4/0 /30‘/§]/ _i

:1:-\~ 0014\101143_0_ 4000/00§_[0/ /\/€00)//\/0 D/\/A mooH~ 010140. ami/21 nejaj1 \/0 2240/1404 1914 021/11 .601£0?50/_00_ ._21€11’02‘122/ 1/12-_ 2201_144_ 04 0@[00/22/11400£&4@0 1255 221420212102_ 102 0,221122220\/2~%;[:0 407 1401 011/002 202th 2240222021/10 22@\2021 _/00é22)/L O___1S_1?/2 &705[/021/(2/‘124_%1€_/ 22_ 3_22_2(

/02\)25\1{\102€2_

1/\2`219/1/`€2@2®1"€2 _)/_9_)/_1_4/_\_15 _1@%§_1491[€4 _)¢/140,_/10:¢/)}

2)0[0\{522\214\1§224`01/10 1@_ 521)14~)¢ ;J/,:Z( :0/¢\£2:;¢0:;_/€¢€

2@12§€)_\1226£ 0 - 02 , ._ 2

42_/§14_7_ _1)3_1442____0,140/ 001/140 40 ¢/1»02 _014 _£_0_14__, .:0_§/0214_§2210§¢ 1< 10102/51 1114 %0_ ._1_/]_04;420_20_ ~ -`\1,123\11002 140501¢1_1;¢/,2 1

. 4 ' 710§1:)0<>$[>10/75014101#04/ .22,_,, __ (3\ 2d 2 2 2 _ m§a 2

. £€/HlN/¢)Oaje 533 <>__@r\//c>{

414/gi s\lo 8953)3~44 C3/3/\0~§ 01/\ gwa€ay 0535/0\/ §O/§` 5 33:66-€ cwsz d@_bi?€c;¢_ia ia// 053 KL/)€ 450¢/€ 35¢€@05 v\Q. 630061/1/151\55115)5£1§@»33 555 _/5$131_/5@11/_/@1 \35 '5>@3>\/51 AJ~Lreq "/'/erk 5apt _1/5;1511-53 54,461_5_ 1135_»3_55>311_ a,/;\f 511_117571/55 _,_/'a_a_ 151511<5511_>5 551¢5./115 /1,)czarka4»501. e`)caz 7 _§__0/

. n _ ` 54a5/3<. 1::\)65\;/551 E/L€} 311 ' 5/5’9 515/4 552

/< 535 z 781//?__1 555/ami 55€5’5/3@

, bac(&,l/Udl _14~____1 . v , _:_}4ME051_M1&51?L15\M_€135~1151 M€M:M

_ 611:1____1:__33-/37\0\…__ 1 _ €5305#69 _1 _C::LL§~M _`3:31\€:3__` _Q:_®L\\;___)%¢do)/( \3135¢%31 6 0 1555/4&533@\ )¢w'€, 1101 515 055/111335 51§5~ 53 m_711{1v553)13157€1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mark Eugene Engle v. State, (Tex. 2015).

Mark Eugene Engle v. State (Mark Eugene Engle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.