Mark Edward Partners LLC v. Cosgrove

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedMay 18, 2020
Docket1:20-cv-03766
StatusUnknown

This text of Mark Edward Partners LLC v. Cosgrove (Mark Edward Partners LLC v. Cosgrove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mark Edward Partners LLC v. Cosgrove, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------x

MARK EDWARD PARTNERS LLC,

Plaintiff,

-v- No. 20 CV 3766-LTS

WILLIAM P. COSGROVE, LOCKTON INSURANCE BROKERS, INC.,

Defendants.

-------------------------------------------------------x

ORDER

WHEREAS, this action was commenced by the filing of a Complaint on May 15, 2020, and

WHEREAS, the Court has reviewed such Complaint to ascertain the basis for assertion of subject matter jurisdiction in this court; and

WHEREAS, such Complaint asserts that the Court has jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship (28 U.S.C. § 1332), but has failed to allege the citizenship of the members of the Plaintiff LLC; and

WHEREAS, for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, the citizenship of an artificial business entity other than a corporation is determined by reference to the citizenship of its members, see C.T. Carden v. Arkoma Associates, 494 U.S. 185 (1990); E.R. Squibb & Sons v. Accident & Cas. Ins. Co., 160 F.3d 925 (2d Cir. 1998); Keith v. Black Diamond Advisors, Inc., 48 F. Supp. 2d 326 (S.D.N.Y. 1999); and

WHEREAS, "'subject matter jurisdiction is an unwaivable sine qua non for the exercise of federal judicial power,'" E.R. Squibb & Sons v. Accident & Cas. Ins. Co., 160 F.3d 925, 929 (2d Cir. 1998) (citation omitted), and Rule 12(h)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that "[i]f the court determines at any time that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action;" it is hereby ORDERED, that plaintiff shall, no later than June 2, 2020, file and serve a Supplement to the Complaint containing allegations sufficient to demonstrate a basis for subject matter jurisdiction in this Court or otherwise show cause in writing as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: New York, New York May 18, 2020

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carden v. Arkoma Associates
494 U.S. 185 (Supreme Court, 1990)
Keith v. Black Diamond Advisors, Inc.
48 F. Supp. 2d 326 (S.D. New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mark Edward Partners LLC v. Cosgrove, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-edward-partners-llc-v-cosgrove-nysd-2020.