Mark Decker Construction v. Koppe

599 So. 2d 782, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6802, 1992 WL 137682
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 23, 1992·No. No. 91-1611·Published

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

We affirm the compensation award in the instant case except as to the extent it may allow an award for remedial medical care following claimant’s date of maximum medical improvement from the second accident. Under most circumstances, including those at issue here, an award of further remedial treatment after a claimant has [783] reached MMI is error. Old Cove Condo v. Curry, 511 So.2d 666 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Universal Corporation v. Lawson, 447 So.2d 293 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

In that regard, we also note that the judge of compensation claims did not make a specific finding in his order as to the pertinent dates of maximum medical improvement. Accordingly, that portion of the order awarding further remedial treatment is reversed and the cause remanded to the JCC to clarify his order and to make a specific finding of maximum medical improvement relative to any award of medical benefits.

BOOTH and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mark Decker Construction v. Koppe, 599 So. 2d 782, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6802, 1992 WL 137682 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

599 So. 2d 782 (Mark Decker Construction v. Koppe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Universal Corp. v. Lawson
447 So. 2d 293 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Old Cove Condo v. Curry
511 So. 2d 666 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)