Mark Decker Construction v. Koppe
This text of 599 So. 2d 782 (Mark Decker Construction v. Koppe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the compensation award in the instant case except as to the extent it may allow an award for remedial medical care following claimant’s date of maximum medical improvement from the second accident. Under most circumstances, including those at issue here, an award of further remedial treatment after a claimant has [783]*783reached MMI is error. Old Cove Condo v. Curry, 511 So.2d 666 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Universal Corporation v. Lawson, 447 So.2d 293 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
In that regard, we also note that the judge of compensation claims did not make a specific finding in his order as to the pertinent dates of maximum medical improvement. Accordingly, that portion of the order awarding further remedial treatment is reversed and the cause remanded to the JCC to clarify his order and to make a specific finding of maximum medical improvement relative to any award of medical benefits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
599 So. 2d 782, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6802, 1992 WL 137682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-decker-construction-v-koppe-fladistctapp-1992.