Mark Damon Charlot v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 21, 2023
Docket14-23-00681-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Mark Damon Charlot v. the State of Texas (Mark Damon Charlot v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mark Damon Charlot v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 21, 2023

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00681-CR

MARK DAMON CHARLOT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 351st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1715584

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 28, 2022, appellant was sentenced to ten (10) years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice – Institutional Division after a Presentence Investigation (PSI) Hearing for the offense of continuous violence against the family. Appellant mailed the notice of appeal on March 21, 2023; the notice of appeal was file stamped on September 11, 2023. A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id. On October 4, 2023, the parties were notified that the appeal would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction unless a party demonstrated that the court has jurisdiction. Appellant’s response does not demonstrate this court’s jurisdiction.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hassan, Poissant, and Wilson. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mark Damon Charlot v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-damon-charlot-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.