Mark Coleman, et al. v. Nuttal, Inc., et al.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MARK COLEMAN, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-00988-JLT-SAB Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO TERMINATE SOUTHWEST PENSION v. ADMINISTRATION, LLC NUTTAL, INC., et al., (ECF No. 44) Defendants. Plaintiff has filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice as to Defendant Southwest Pension Administration, LLC, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. “[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), ‘a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.’” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999), quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). “[A] dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order is required, the parties are left as though no action had been brought, the defendant can’t complain, and the district court lacks jurisdiction to do anything about it.” Id. at 1078; see also Pedrina v. Chun, 987 F.2d 608, 609 (9th Cir. 1993). In this action, no defendant has filed an answer, other responsive pleading, or motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to TERMINATE Defendant Southwest Pension Administration, LLC, in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. Se Dated: _ February 10, 2026 STANLEY A. BOONE United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mark Coleman, et al. v. Nuttal, Inc., et al. (Mark Coleman, et al. v. Nuttal, Inc., et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.