Mark Burke v. KPH-Consolidation Inc., D/B/A HCA Houston Healthcare Kingwood, a Domestic For-Profit Corporation
This text of Mark Burke v. KPH-Consolidation Inc., D/B/A HCA Houston Healthcare Kingwood, a Domestic For-Profit Corporation (Mark Burke v. KPH-Consolidation Inc., D/B/A HCA Houston Healthcare Kingwood, a Domestic For-Profit Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 18, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-23-00647-CV
MARK BURKE, Appellant
V.
KPH-CONSOLIDATION INC., D/B/A HCA HOUSTON HEALTHCARE KINGWOOD, A DOMESTIC FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION, Appellee
On Appeal from the 234th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2022-68307
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is from a judgment signed August 3, 2023. The notice of appeal was filed August 31, 2023. No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.
On December 4, 2023, notification was transmitted to appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice unless, within fifteen days, appellant made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No response demonstrating payment was filed in response to that notice.
On December 28, 2023, appellant was ordered to demonstrate he had made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record on or before January 8, 2024. In the order, the court notified appellant that failure to comply with that requirement would leave the appeal subject to dismissal for want of prosecution without further notice. Appellant has not filed any response demonstrating he has made arrangements to pay for the record. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Hassan, Poissant, and Wilson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mark Burke v. KPH-Consolidation Inc., D/B/A HCA Houston Healthcare Kingwood, a Domestic For-Profit Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-burke-v-kph-consolidation-inc-dba-hca-houston-healthcare-texapp-2024.