Mark Brown v. Shelia Lopez and Mattie Jackson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Mark Brown v. Shelia Lopez and Mattie Jackson

DecidedSeptember 30, 2009

Docket12-09-00262-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Mark Brown v. Shelia Lopez and Mattie Jackson (Mark Brown v. Shelia Lopez and Mattie Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mark Brown v. Shelia Lopez and Mattie Jackson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

NO

NO. 12-09-00262-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

MARK BROWN, ' APPEAL FROM THE 87TH

APPELLANT

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

SHELIA LOPEZ AND

MATTIE JACKSON,

APPELLEES ' ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This pro se appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in this case was signed on July17, 2009. Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal that failed to contain the information required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and 25.1(e), i.e., a certificate of service showing service on all parties to the trial court's judgment.

On August 24, 2009, Appellant was notified pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with rules 9.5 and 25.1(e). He was further notified that unless he filed an amended notice of appeal on or before September 23, 2009, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). The deadline for filing an amended notice of appeal has passed, and Appellant has not corrected his defective notice of appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c); Feist v. Berg, No. 12-04-00004-CV, 2004 WL 252785, at *1 (Tex. App.-Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied); Feist v. Hubert, No. 12-03-00442-CV, 2004 WL 252285, at *1 (Tex. App.-Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied).

Opinion delivered September 30, 2009.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NO

NO. 12-09-00262-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

MARK BROWN, ' APPEAL FROM THE 87TH

APPELLANT

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

SHELIA LOPEZ AND

MATTIE JACKSON,

APPELLEES ' ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This pro se appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in this case was signed on July17, 2009. Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal that failed to contain the information required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and 25.1(e), i.e., a certificate of service showing service on all parties to the trial court's judgment.

On August 24, 2009, Appellant was notified pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with rules 9.5 and 25.1(e). He was further notified that unless he filed an amended notice of appeal on or before September 23, 2009, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). The deadline for filing an amended notice of appeal has passed, and Appellant has not corrected his defective notice of appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c); Feist v. Berg, No. 12-04-00004-CV, 2004 WL 252785, at *1 (Tex. App.-Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied); Feist v. Hubert, No. 12-03-00442-CV, 2004 WL 252285, at *1 (Tex. App.-Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied).

Opinion delivered September 30, 2009.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Mark Brown v. Shelia Lopez and Mattie Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-brown-v-shelia-lopez-and-mattie-jackson-texapp-2009.