MARK BRODSKY v. IRAIDA SCHWARTZ

District Court of Appeal of Florida

MARK BRODSKY v. IRAIDA SCHWARTZ

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 27, 2022

Docket21-2061

StatusPublished

This text of MARK BRODSKY v. IRAIDA SCHWARTZ (MARK BRODSKY v. IRAIDA SCHWARTZ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MARK BRODSKY v. IRAIDA SCHWARTZ, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

MARK BRODSKY, Appellant,

v.

IRAIDA SCHWARTZ, Appellee.

No. 4D21-2061

[January 27, 2022]

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Jennifer Waters, Judge; L.T. Case No. 432017DR000279.

Mark Brodsky, Jupiter, pro se.

Karen O’Brien Steger of Steger Law, Stuart, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, KLINGENSMITH and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI