Mark Bradford, Mike Curtis, Stephen Duncombe, and Larry Nikel v. Coy Clayton, Katie Clayton, and Christopher Clayton
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-23-00043-CV
MARK BRADFORD, MIKE CURTIS, STEPHEN DUNCOMBE, AND LARRY NIKEL, Appellants
V.
COY CLAYTON, KATIE CLAYTON, AND CHRISTOPHER CLAYTON, Appellees
On Appeal from the 278th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 2130058
Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice van Cleef MEMORANDUM OPINION
The appellants filed a motion with this Court seeking to voluntarily dismiss this appeal.1
Pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the motion is granted.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.
Charles van Cleef Justice
Date Submitted: May 1, 2023 Date Decided: May 2, 2023
1 Originally appealed to the Tenth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mark Bradford, Mike Curtis, Stephen Duncombe, and Larry Nikel v. Coy Clayton, Katie Clayton, and Christopher Clayton (Mark Bradford, Mike Curtis, Stephen Duncombe, and Larry Nikel v. Coy Clayton, Katie Clayton, and Christopher Clayton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.