Mark B. v. Karen D.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mark B. v. Karen D.

38 A.D.3d 1331, 831 N.Y.S.2d 90

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.3d 1331 (Mark B. v. Karen D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mark B. v. Karen D., 38 A.D.3d 1331, 831 N.Y.S.2d 90 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (James R. Griffith, J.), entered March 30, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded respondent sole custody of the parties’ child and permitted the child to relocate with respondent to Scotland.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Scudder, RJ., Hurlbutt, Centra, Fahey and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (James R. Griffith, J.), entered March 30, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded respondent sole custody of the parties’ child and permitted the child to relocate with respondent to Scotland.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Scudder, RJ., Hurlbutt, Centra, Fahey and Green, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.3d 1331, 831 N.Y.S.2d 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-b-v-karen-d-nyappdiv-2007.