Mark B. Harrison v. BNSF Railway Company

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mark B. Harrison v. BNSF Railway Company. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 1086 →

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 30, 2014·No. 02-12-00476-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00476-CV

Mark B. Harrison § From the 342nd District Court § of Tarrant County (342-237705-09)

January 30, 2014

v. § Opinion by Justice Meier

Concurrence and Dissent by BNSF Railway Company § Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellant Mark B. Harrison shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier_______________________ Justice Bill Meier

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00476-CV

Mark B. Harrison § From the 342nd District Court § of Tarrant County (342-237705-09)

January 30, 2014

v. § Opinion by Justice Meier

Concurrence and Dissent by BNSF Railway Company § Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that Appellant Mark B. Harrison shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier_______________________ Justice Bill Meier

Mark B. Harrison v. BNSF Railway Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Mark B. Harrison v. BNSF Railway Company (Mark B. Harrison v. BNSF Railway Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.