Mark Anthony Young v. State

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 12, 2015
Docket06-14-00086-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Mark Anthony Young v. State (Mark Anthony Young v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mark Anthony Young v. State, (Tex. 2015).

Opinion

RECEWED|N The, ilaqu O,f APPea's -» MARK ANTHONY YoUNG, S'Dth'Sf"‘=f ' § App.NO. 06-14~00086-cR APPELLANT 1 5 MAM m '§ IN THE coURT oF .APPEALS

v' t Te>;az'§

MAR 1 2 2015

T _ fn :;:;kana, I`exas -. /A¢wmney,, Glenk

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE A RESPONSE

TO ANDERS BRIEF

Now comes Mark Anthony Young,appellant,pro se, in the above styled and number cause to present a Motion for Extension of Time »inwhich to File a Response to Anders Brief/that was filed by Young's court-appointed attorney. Young request that the exten- sion be for 30-days.Appellants request for extension of time is not for purposes of delay/but that he may fairly have enough time to properly prepare a response. Arespymef is due on March 19,2015.

In support of his motion Young shows the following:

A). Appellant is incarcerated at the Michael Unit,in Tennessee Colony/Tx,where the unit is on a scheduled lockdown starting March 4,2015.

B). Appellant has reviewed the 'DVD' of the surveillance video played to the jury,(onley part of this video was played), in shis case. The 'endingf"of this viedo shows that some-_ one outher than the appellant committed the crime.Young ' is trying to properly prepare a response for this-Court.

C). Appellant has reviewed the trial record and beleives there are ground§s) that can be raised on direct appeal, that was harmfull at trial. Young is trying to properly prepare those ground(s) for this Court to review.

Additionally,Young is a pro se litigant.And/due to his lack of legal knowledge and his limited legal reasearch material pro- vided at the Michael Unit law library/Young needs additional time to fully pre pare and file a response to the Anders Brief.Young assures the Court that this request is not designed to harass/nor to unnecessarily delay these proceedings/butto ensure that Young has sufficient time to fully and properly respond to the Anders Brief. For the foregoing reasons,Young respectfully moves this Court for an extension,up to and including April 18,2015,to file a response/or in the alternative,Young ask this Court to review

the 'DVD' and the Trial Records,for error.

INMATE DECLARATION

I, Mark Anthony Young,TDCJ # \q ')_qq lo\ ,currently incarcerated in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice,at the Michael Unite,in Tennessee colony/Texas,do solemnly swear under the penalties of perjury that the fore- going Motion is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.I further state the enclosed information is true and correct

EXECUTED ON THIS 4 day Of MarCh 2015.

ML;>@M _

Mark Anthon Young

TDcJ #\°\'L“\ (.e\ 33: Michael Unit

2664 FM 2054

Tennessee Colony,Tx75886

APPELLANT/PRO SE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mark Anthony Young v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-anthony-young-v-state-texcrimapp-2015.