Mark Alexander Ray v. Jacob Beasley; Rodney Foulks; Keenan Carver; Willesha Warren; Ashley Kennedy; and Unit Manager Edwards

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia
DecidedFebruary 17, 2026
Docket6:25-cv-00074
StatusUnknown

This text of Mark Alexander Ray v. Jacob Beasley; Rodney Foulks; Keenan Carver; Willesha Warren; Ashley Kennedy; and Unit Manager Edwards (Mark Alexander Ray v. Jacob Beasley; Rodney Foulks; Keenan Carver; Willesha Warren; Ashley Kennedy; and Unit Manager Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mark Alexander Ray v. Jacob Beasley; Rodney Foulks; Keenan Carver; Willesha Warren; Ashley Kennedy; and Unit Manager Edwards, (S.D. Ga. 2026).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

STATESBORO DIVISION

MARK ALEXANDER RAY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV 625-074 ) JACOB BEASLEY; RODNEY FOULKS; ) KEENAN CARVER; WILLESHA ) WARREN; ASHLEY KENNEDY; and UNIT ) MANAGER EDWARDS, ) ) Defendants. )

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, incarcerated at Johnson State Prison in Wrightsville, Georgia, filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 concerning events alleged to have occurred during his incarceration at Smith State Prison in Glennville, Georgia. (Doc. no. 1.) On October 24, 2025, the Court directed Plaintiff to return his Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement and Consent to Collection of Fees forms within thirty days and advised Plaintiff all prisoners, even those proceeding IFP, must pay the filing fee of $350.00 in full. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). (See doc. no. 5.) Plaintiff submitted his forms on December 1, 2025. (Doc. nos. 6, 7.) However, on December 4, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff to re-submit his Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement because it did not include the required supporting documentation and accounting ledger. (Doc. no. 10.) Plaintiff requested and received an extension of time to re-submit his Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (Doc. nos. 11, 12.) The time to respond has passed, and Plaintiff has not submitted his Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement as required by the Court’s December 4th Order, nor has he provided the Court with any explanation as to why he has not complied. Plaintiff cannot proceed IFP unless he submits the requisite Trust Fund Account Statement and consents to collection of the entire $350.00 filing fee in installments. Wilson v. Sargent, 313 F.3d 1315, 1319, 1321 (11th Cir. 2002) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915). Plaintiff has been warned that failing to return the necessary IFP papers would be an election to have his case voluntarily dismissed. As Plaintiff has neither fulfilled the requirements for proceeding IFP, nor paid the full filing fee, the Court REPORTS and RECOMMENDS this case be DISMISSED without prejudice and this civil action be CLOSED. SO REPORTED and RECOMMENDED this 17th day of February, 2026, at Augusta, Georgia. fh. k bo BRIAN K ERPS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Charles D. Wilson, Sr. v. George Sargent
313 F.3d 1315 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mark Alexander Ray v. Jacob Beasley; Rodney Foulks; Keenan Carver; Willesha Warren; Ashley Kennedy; and Unit Manager Edwards, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-alexander-ray-v-jacob-beasley-rodney-foulks-keenan-carver-willesha-gasd-2026.