Mark a Roseman v. City of Detroit
This text of Mark a Roseman v. City of Detroit (Mark a Roseman v. City of Detroit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
February 5, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra 151790 Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, MARK A. ROSEMAN and LUZATER Justices ROSEMAN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v SC: 151790 COA: 314650 Wayne CC: 11-011214-NO CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant, and MUKASH PATEL, DENNIS STOKES, and WILLIAM MCPHERSON Defendants-Appellants.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 7, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the parties to file supplemental briefs, within 28 days of the date of this order, addressing whether the plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act (WDCA). See MCL 418.131(1); Harris v Vernier, 242 Mich App 306, 316 (2000) (exclusive remedy provision of the WDCA implicates subject matter jurisdiction and may be raised at any time).
The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 5, 2016 s0202 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mark a Roseman v. City of Detroit, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mark-a-roseman-v-city-of-detroit-mich-2016.