Mark a Roseman v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided February 5, 2016·No. 151790·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

February 5, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

151790 Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

MARK A. ROSEMAN and LUZATER Justices ROSEMAN, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 151790 COA: 314650 Wayne CC: 11-011214-NO

CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant,

and MUKASH PATEL, DENNIS STOKES, and WILLIAM MCPHERSON Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 7, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the parties to file supplemental briefs, within 28 days of the date of this order, addressing whether the plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act (WDCA). See MCL 418.131(1); Harris v Vernier, 242 Mich App 306, 316 (2000) (exclusive remedy provision of the WDCA implicates subject matter jurisdiction and may be raised at any time).

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 5, 2016

s0202

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mark a Roseman v. City of Detroit, (Mich. 2016).

Mark a Roseman v. City of Detroit (Mark a Roseman v. City of Detroit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. Vernier
617 N.W.2d 764 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2000)