Marjam Supply Co. v. Nu-Way Plastering, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Marjam Supply Co. v. Nu-Way Plastering, Inc.

302 A.D.2d 435, 754 N.Y.S.2d 900, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1377

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 302 A.D.2d 435 (Marjam Supply Co. v. Nu-Way Plastering, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marjam Supply Co. v. Nu-Way Plastering, Inc., 302 A.D.2d 435, 754 N.Y.S.2d 900, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1377 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to foreclose a public improvement lien, the defendant Carter-Melence, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), dated May 6, 2002, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (3) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, and considering the liberal construction given to the Lien Law (see Lien Law § 23), the Supreme Court correctly determined that the plaintiff properly filed the lien at issue (see Lien Law § 12; Hawkins v Mapes-Reeve Constr. Co., 178 NY 236). Florio, J.P., Friedmann, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to foreclose a public improvement lien, the defendant Carter-Melence, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), dated May 6, 2002, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (3) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, and considering the liberal construction given to the Lien Law (see Lien Law § 23), the Supreme Court correctly determined that the plaintiff properly filed the lien at issue (see Lien Law § 12; Hawkins v Mapes-Reeve Constr. Co., 178 NY 236). Florio, J.P., Friedmann, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 A.D.2d 435, 754 N.Y.S.2d 900, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marjam-supply-co-v-nu-way-plastering-inc-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack