Mariya Airikyan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 597 F. App'x 199 (Mariya Airikyan v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Mariya Yevgenyevna Airikyan, a native of Armenia and a citizen of Kazakhstan, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of her requests for asylum and withholding of removal. * We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Airikyan’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the adverse credibility finding. See Tewabe v. Gonzales, 446 F.3d 533, 538 (4th Cir.2006). We further conclude that a review of Airikyan’s independent corroborating evidence does not compel a different result.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Airikyan (B.I.A. Aug. 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Airikyan does not challenge the denial of relief under the Convention Against Torture. Accordingly, review of that issue is waived. See Ngarurih v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 182, 189 n. 7 (4th Cir.2004).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
597 F. App'x 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mariya-airikyan-v-eric-holder-jr-ca4-2015.