Maritza P. v. Devereux Foundation

2017 NY Slip Op 2945, 149 A.D.3d 554, 50 N.Y.S.3d 268
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 18, 2017·No. 3762 101423/10·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered on or about December 17, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants-appellants’ (defendants) motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants having satisfied their initial burden on summary judgment, the burden shifted to plaintiffs to raise a triable issue of fact (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). In satisfaction of their burden, plaintiffs offered competent proof in the form of deposition testimony, medical records and police records, which raised triable issues (see generally N.X. v Cabrini Med. Ctr., 97 NY2d 247 [2002]; Kelly G. v Board of Educ. of City of Yonkers, 99 AD3d 756 [2d Dept 2012]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maritza P. v. Devereux Foundation, 2017 NY Slip Op 2945, 149 A.D.3d 554, 50 N.Y.S.3d 268 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 2945 (Maritza P. v. Devereux Foundation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

North Flats LLC v. Belkin Burden Goldman, LLP
2025 NY Slip Op 31640(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)