Home/Third Circuit/Maritime Service Committee, Inc. v. International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots

Maritime Service Committee, Inc. v. International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots

394 F.2d 160
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 10, 1968·No. Nos. 16679-16681, 16685·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

Events which have transpired since the entry of the Orders appealed from at Appeals Nos. 16679, 16680 and 16685 establish beyond question that the questions they present have become moot and these appeals will be dismissed for that reason.

The Appeal at No. 16681 is from the entry of an Order which is clearly interlocutory and it will be dismissed for the reason that it is not an appeal-able Order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maritime Service Committee, Inc. v. International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots, 394 F.2d 160 (3d Cir. 1968).

394 F.2d 160 (Maritime Service Committee, Inc. v. International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maritime Service Committee, Inc., Farrell Lines, Inc., Grace Line, Inc., Gulf & South American Steamship Co., Inc., Lykes Rros. Steamship Co., Inc., Marine Transport Lines, Inc., Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. And United States Lines, Inc. v. International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots, Afl-Cio, Tanker Service Committee, Inc. v. International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots, Afl-Cio, American Maritime Association v. International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots, International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots Local 14, Lloyd W. Sheldon, Thomas F. O'callaghan, Moe Weinstein and John Handley, American Maritime Association v. International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots, International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots Local 14, Lloyd W. Sheldon, Thomas F. O'callaghan, Moe Weinstein and John Handley
394 F.2d 160 (Third Circuit, 1968)