Marissa Rosales v. La Armada II
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00247-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
MARISSA ROSALES, Appellant,
v.
LA ARMADA II, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Silva
On May 27, 2022, appellant filed a notice of appeal. On June 1, 2022 and July 14,
2022, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that her notice of appeal was not in
compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellant Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(e),
25.1(d)(1), (2), (4). Appellant was also advised that, if the defects were not corrected within ten days from the date of the letters, the appeal would be dismissed. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).
Furthermore, on June 27, 2022, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that her
docketing statement had not been filed as previously requested; the Clerk of the Court
further requested appellant immediately complete and return a docketing statement.
Appellant has not filed a docketing statement, has failed to correct the defects in
her notice of appeal, and has otherwise not responded to the notices from the clerk
requiring a response or other action within the time specified; accordingly, the appeal is
dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. 42.3(b), (c).
CLARISSA SILVA Justice
Delivered and filed on the 25th day of August, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marissa Rosales v. La Armada II (Marissa Rosales v. La Armada II) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.