Marisol Torres Ortega v. Eric Holder, Jr.

485 F. App'x 866
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 15, 2012
Docket11-71019
StatusUnpublished

This text of 485 F. App'x 866 (Marisol Torres Ortega v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marisol Torres Ortega v. Eric Holder, Jr., 485 F. App'x 866 (9th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Marisol Torres Ortega, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s continuous physical presence determination, Lopez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 847, 850-51 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Ortega did not meet the continuous physical presence requirement where her sworn affidavit and cancellation of removal applications indicated that she departed the United States for Mexico in August 1994 and that she remained there for a period greater than 90 days. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(d)(2) (departure in excess of 90 days breaks continuous physical presence).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
485 F. App'x 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marisol-torres-ortega-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2012.