Maris Leibman and Ezra David Hill v. United States
Opinion
..We have carefully considered the contention of appellant that the prosecution here arose out of the illegal finding of marijuana as the fruits of an unlawful search. We conclude that, under the undisputed circumstances of this case, including the conceded right of the motel operator to enter the room for housekeeping purposes, no Fourth Amendment rights of the appellants were invaded. The subsequent arrest, at a time the officers knew the appellants were in possession of the marijuana, was fully warranted.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
404 F.2d 348 (Maris Leibman and Ezra David Hill v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.