Marion v. State

892 So. 2d 1131, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 20033, 2004 WL 3001095
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Marion v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11040
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 29, 2004·No. No. 3D04-1553·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Trabón Marion appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court denied relief, and cheeked the box on the form order indicating that the denial occurred after an evi-dentiary hearing. The State reports, however, that there was no evidentiary hearing and this entry on the order is a clerical error. Accordingly, we treat the appeal as an appeal from an order summarily denying postconviction relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2).

Upon consideration of the record now before us and the file in defendant-appellant Marion’s direct appeal, Marion v. State, No. 3D03-1557, 871 So.2d 888 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), we concur with the trial court that the defendant is not entitled to postconviction relief.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marion v. State, 892 So. 2d 1131, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 20033, 2004 WL 3001095 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

892 So. 2d 1131 (Marion v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.