Marion v. State
673 So. 2d 918, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4754, 1996 WL 239291
This text of 673 So. 2d 918 (Marion v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Marion v. State, 673 So. 2d 918, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4754, 1996 WL 239291 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
Opinion
Lisa Marion appeals a fine imposed after she began serving her term of probation. Because it constitutes an impermissible increase in an otherwise legal sentence, we strike the fine. See Coll v. State, 629 So.2d 1056 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (holding that a court may not increase a legal sentence after it has begun).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Coll v. State
629 So. 2d 1056 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
673 So. 2d 918, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4754, 1996 WL 239291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marion-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.