Marion v. State

586 So. 2d 67, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6849, 1991 WL 118231
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 5, 1991·No. No. 90-01160·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions. We also affirm the issue wherein the appellant attacks the constitutionality of section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1988 Supp.). See Arnold v. State, 566 So.2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). However, we reverse the appellant’s habitual offender sentences and remand for resentencing. In order to be sentenced as a habitual offender under section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1988), a defendant must have successive felony convictions. The appellant’s two prior convictions were rendered on the same date, and so they should have been treated as a single offense. Walker v. State, 567 So.2d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and RYDER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marion v. State, 586 So. 2d 67, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6849, 1991 WL 118231 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

586 So. 2d 67 (Marion v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tito v. State
593 So. 2d 284 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Godwin v. State
586 So. 2d 1257 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)