Marion v. State
131 So. 923, 24 Ala. App. 663
Opinion
Defendant was convicted on a charge of violating the prohibition law. -
The evidence was in conflict, and presented a jury question. The court did not err in refusing the defendant the general charge.
There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marion v. State, 131 So. 923, 24 Ala. App. 663 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).
131 So. 923 (Marion v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.