Marion v. State

131 So. 923, 24 Ala. App. 664
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 17, 1930
Docket8 Div. 74.
StatusPublished

This text of 131 So. 923 (Marion v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marion v. State, 131 So. 923, 24 Ala. App. 664 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition law. The facts as testified to present a jury question, which in all things was properly referred to them by the court.

We find no error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 So. 923, 24 Ala. App. 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marion-v-state-alactapp-1930.