Marion v. State
107 So. 926, 21 Ala. App. 684
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition law. The trial was had before the judge without a jury, and therefore his findings-as to the facts have the force and effect of a verdict by a jury. We have examined the facts as shown by the bill of exceptions, and find no just cause for disturbing the judgment. Let the judgment be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marion v. State, 107 So. 926, 21 Ala. App. 684 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).
107 So. 926 (Marion v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.