Marion v. State
107 So. 926, 21 Ala. App. 684
This text of 107 So. 926 (Marion v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Marion v. State, 107 So. 926, 21 Ala. App. 684 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition law. The trial was had before the judge without a jury, and therefore his findings-as to the facts have the force and effect of a verdict by a jury. We have examined the facts as shown by the bill of exceptions, and find no just cause for disturbing the judgment. Let the judgment be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
107 So. 926, 21 Ala. App. 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marion-v-state-alactapp-1926.