Marion v. Kmeier Roof Systems, Inc.
This text of 87 S.W.3d 914 (Marion v. Kmeier Roof Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Appellants, Kmeier Roof System, Inc., and American Protection Insurance Co., appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s temporary and partial award, affirming the decision of the Administrative Law Judge, in favor of respondent, Cornelius Marion, on his claims for worker’s compensation benefits. We affirm.1
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find the judgment is supported by substantial and competent evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence based on the record as a whole. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 S.W.3d 914, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2116, 2002 WL 31368144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marion-v-kmeier-roof-systems-inc-moctapp-2002.