Marion M. Achinger, of the Estate of William C. Achinger, Deceased v. Hans Hansen Welding Company, Inc., Owner of the Motorboat the Weldcraft, Ii, Mildred Williams, Adm'x of the Estate of Allen Williams, Deceased v. Hans Hansen Welding Company, Inc., Owner of the Motorboat the Weldcraft, Ii, the Weldcraft, II

196 F.2d 222, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2445
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 7, 1952
Docket11441_1
StatusPublished

This text of 196 F.2d 222 (Marion M. Achinger, of the Estate of William C. Achinger, Deceased v. Hans Hansen Welding Company, Inc., Owner of the Motorboat the Weldcraft, Ii, Mildred Williams, Adm'x of the Estate of Allen Williams, Deceased v. Hans Hansen Welding Company, Inc., Owner of the Motorboat the Weldcraft, Ii, the Weldcraft, II) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marion M. Achinger, of the Estate of William C. Achinger, Deceased v. Hans Hansen Welding Company, Inc., Owner of the Motorboat the Weldcraft, Ii, Mildred Williams, Adm'x of the Estate of Allen Williams, Deceased v. Hans Hansen Welding Company, Inc., Owner of the Motorboat the Weldcraft, Ii, the Weldcraft, II, 196 F.2d 222, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2445 (6th Cir. 1952).

Opinion

196 F.2d 222

Marion M. ACHINGER, Executrix of the Estate of William C.
Achinger, deceased, Appellant,
v.
HANS HANSEN WELDING COMPANY, Inc., Owner of the Motorboat
The Weldcraft, II, Appellee.
Mildred WILLIAMS, Adm'x of the Estate of Allen Williams,
deceased, et al., Appellants,
v.
HANS HANSEN WELDING COMPANY, Inc., Owner of the Motorboat
The Weldcraft, II, Appellee.
THE WELDCRAFT, II.

Nos. 11440, 11441.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 7, 1952.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Toledo; Frank Le Blond Kloeb, Judge.

McCreary, Hinslea & Ray, Cleveland, Ohio, Bryce & Duffey, and William A. Finn, and James Nye, all of Toledo, Ohio, for appellants.

Williams & Eversman, Toledo, Ohio, for appellee.

Before ALLEN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

These companion cases came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel.

And it appearing that decision is controlled by certain questions of fact upon which the District Court made detailed findings which are not clearly against the preponderance of the evidence: The Cleveco, 6 Cir., 154 F.2d 605, 609; Larsson v. Coastwise Line, 9 Cir., 181 F.2d 6, 9, certiorari denied, 340 U.S. 833, 71 S.Ct. 55, 95 L.Ed. 612.

It is ordered that the judgments be, and they hereby are affirmed for the reasons stated in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Larsson v. Coastwise (Pacific Far East) Line
181 F.2d 6 (Ninth Circuit, 1950)
The Cleveco
154 F.2d 605 (Sixth Circuit, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 F.2d 222, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marion-m-achinger-of-the-estate-of-william-c-achinger-deceased-v-hans-ca6-1952.