Marion Looney v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Marion Looney v. United States

265 F.2d 345, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 153, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4566

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJanuary 15, 1959

Docket14713_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 265 F.2d 345 (Marion Looney v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marion Looney v. United States, 265 F.2d 345, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 153, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4566 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction for robbery. Appellant urges the insufficiency of the evidence and the ineffectiveness of trial counsel, the latter as a means of raising a question as to the legality of his arrest and the consequent legality of subsequent occurrences, a point not raised in the trial court. Despite the earnest and skillful presentation by court-appointed counsel, we find no error affecting appellant’s substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction for robbery. Appellant urges the insufficiency of the evidence and the ineffectiveness of trial counsel, the latter as a means of raising a question as to the legality of his arrest and the consequent legality of subsequent occurrences, a point not raised in the trial court. Despite the earnest and skillful presentation by court-appointed counsel, we find no error affecting appellant’s substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 F.2d 345, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 153, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marion-looney-v-united-states-cadc-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack