Marion L. Weik v. Christopher Vaughn
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-10-00363-CV
MARION L. WEIK APPELLANT
V.
CHRISTOPHER VAUGHN APPELLEE
------------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On January 19, 2011, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed
as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P.
38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless
appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within
ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: March 10, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marion L. Weik v. Christopher Vaughn (Marion L. Weik v. Christopher Vaughn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.