Marion L. Weik v. Christopher Vaughn

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 10, 2011·No. 02-10-00363-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00363-CV

MARION L. WEIK APPELLANT

V.

CHRISTOPHER VAUGHN APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On January 19, 2011, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed

as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P.

38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless

appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within

ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 10, 2011

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marion L. Weik v. Christopher Vaughn, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Marion L. Weik v. Christopher Vaughn (Marion L. Weik v. Christopher Vaughn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.