Marion J. E. Tarwater v. United States

416 F.2d 18
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 30, 1969·No. 23764_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tarwater is serving a prison sentence for forging a United States treasury check. He pleaded guilty.

He brought in district court a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He had a hearing on this collateral attack. He was denied relief and appeals.

His point about not having counsel when he pleaded guilty is no good. The record shows that at arraignment he was informed at length as to his right to counsel and he expressly waived assignment of counsel.

His contention that he was drunk, or nearly so, when he pleaded guilty and when he was sentenced was not substantiated at the hearing and was properly rejected.

His argument that he was not guilty was really made for the first time on appeal. Such a contention would come too late in district court and certainly comes too late here.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marion J. E. Tarwater v. United States, 416 F.2d 18 (9th Cir. 1969).

416 F.2d 18 (Marion J. E. Tarwater v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related