MARION GORDEL MCCUTCHEN v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 3, 2023
Docket23-0473
StatusPublished

This text of MARION GORDEL MCCUTCHEN v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (MARION GORDEL MCCUTCHEN v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MARION GORDEL MCCUTCHEN v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed May 3, 2023.

________________

No. 3D23-473 Lower Tribunal No. AGPA77E ________________

Marion Gordel McCutchen, Petitioner,

vs.

The State of Florida, Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public Defender, for petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before SCALES, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ.

On Confession of Error PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Marion Gordel McCutchen petitions this Court for a writ of

habeas corpus or, in the alternative, a writ of mandamus to quash a bench

warrant issued in the County Court of Miami-Dade County. On respondent

State of Florida’s commendable confession of error, we grant the petition for

writ of habeas corpus and quash the trial court’s bench warrant.

On July 27, 2022, Petitioner was arrested for driving without a valid

driver’s license and for driving a vehicle with an expired tag. Petitioner

executed an Acknowledgement of Appointment of the Public Defender to

represent him, which included a waiver of his presence at all pre-trial

conferences, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.180(a)(3).

Petitioner’s case was on a calendar for a status report on March 3,

2023. At this hearing, when Petitioner did not appear, the trial court issued a

bench warrant for Petitioner’s arrest with a $250 bond, despite the Public

Defender informing the trial court that Petitioner had waived his presence in

court. Our record reflects, and the State concedes, that the trial court erred

by not providing advance notice to Petitioner, through counsel, that his

presence in court was required before issuing the bench warrant. See

Westberry v. State, 246 So. 3d 1308, 1309 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

Petition for writ of habeas corpus granted; bench warrant quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Westberry v. State
246 So. 3d 1308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MARION GORDEL MCCUTCHEN v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marion-gordel-mccutchen-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2023.