Marion D. Whitley v. United States
262 F.2d 38, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 326
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Marion D. Whitley v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 237 F.2d 787 →
Opinion
The appellant was convicted of trafficking in narcotics. She claims she was unlawfully arrested without a warrant, that certain statements she made after arrest and before arraignment were erroneously received, that her motions to suppress should have been granted, and that she was entrapped by the officers.
We find no error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marion D. Whitley v. United States, 262 F.2d 38, 104 U.S. App. D.C. 326 (D.C. Cir. 1958).
262 F.2d 38 (Marion D. Whitley v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Marion D. Whitley v. United States
237 F.2d 787 (D.C. Circuit, 1956)
Alice W. Bradford and T. Walter Bradford v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company and the Pullman Company
262 F.2d 38 (D.C. Circuit, 1958)