Marion D. Helmandollar v. Blackhawk Mining, LLC

West Virginia Supreme Court

Marion D. Helmandollar v. Blackhawk Mining, LLC

DecidedSeptember 23, 2024

Docket23-430

StatusPublished

This text of Marion D. Helmandollar v. Blackhawk Mining, LLC (Marion D. Helmandollar v. Blackhawk Mining, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marion D. Helmandollar v. Blackhawk Mining, LLC, (W. Va. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

FILED September 23, 2024 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA

Marion D. Helmandollar, Claimant Below, Petitioner

v.) No. 23-430 (JCN: 2019026743) (ICA No. 23-ICA-4)

Blackhawk Mining, LLC, Employer Below, Respondent

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Petitioner Marion D. Helmandollar appeals the May 22, 2023, memorandum decision of the Intermediate Court of Appeals (“ICA”). See Helmandollar v. Blackhawk Mining, LLC., No. 23-ICA-4, 2023 WL 3581530 (W. Va. Ct. App. May 22, 2023) (memorandum decision). Respondent Blackhawk Mining, LLC, filed a timely response.1 The issue on appeal is whether the ICA erred in affirming the Board of Review’s order, which affirmed the claim administrator’s order granting Mr. Helmandollar no permanent partial disability award.

On appeal, the petitioner argues that the ICA’s decision is clearly wrong in light of the substantial evidence in the record as a whole, and should be reversed because the preponderance of the evidence establishes that the claimant sustained more than 0% whole person impairment as a result of his compensable injury. The respondent counters by arguing that the petitioner was overcompensated by the 22% permanent partial disability that he was awarded in his prior lower back injury claim, and the valid, reliable, and preponderant evidence of record establishes that he has no whole-person impairment resulting from his January 16, 2018, injury.

This Court reviews questions of law de novo, while we accord deference to the Board of Review’s findings of fact unless the findings are clearly wrong. Syl. Pt. 3, Duff v. Kanawha Cnty. Comm’n, No. 23-43, 2024 WL 1715166 (W. Va. Apr. 22, 2024). Upon consideration of the record and briefs, we find no reversible error and therefore summarily affirm. See W. Va. R. App. P. 21(c).

Affirmed.

ISSUED: September 23, 2024 1 The petitioner is represented by counsel Reginald D. Henry and Lori J. Withrow, and the respondent is represented by counsel Sean Harter. 1 CONCURRED IN BY:

Chief Justice Tim Armstead Justice Elizabeth D. Walker Justice John A. Hutchison Justice William R. Wooton Justice C. Haley Bunn

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FILED September 23, 2024 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA

Marion D. Helmandollar, Claimant Below, Petitioner

v.) No. 23-430 (JCN: 2019026743) (ICA No. 23-ICA-4)

Blackhawk Mining, LLC, Employer Below, Respondent

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Petitioner Marion D. Helmandollar appeals the May 22, 2023, memorandum decision of the Intermediate Court of Appeals (“ICA”). See Helmandollar v. Blackhawk Mining, LLC., No. 23-ICA-4, 2023 WL 3581530 (W. Va. Ct. App. May 22, 2023) (memorandum decision). Respondent Blackhawk Mining, LLC, filed a timely response.1 The issue on appeal is whether the ICA erred in affirming the Board of Review’s order, which affirmed the claim administrator’s order granting Mr. Helmandollar no permanent partial disability award.

On appeal, the petitioner argues that the ICA’s decision is clearly wrong in light of the substantial evidence in the record as a whole, and should be reversed because the preponderance of the evidence establishes that the claimant sustained more than 0% whole person impairment as a result of his compensable injury. The respondent counters by arguing that the petitioner was overcompensated by the 22% permanent partial disability that he was awarded in his prior lower back injury claim, and the valid, reliable, and preponderant evidence of record establishes that he has no whole-person impairment resulting from his January 16, 2018, injury.

This Court reviews questions of law de novo, while we accord deference to the Board of Review’s findings of fact unless the findings are clearly wrong. Syl. Pt. 3, Duff v. Kanawha Cnty. Comm’n, No. 23-43, 2024 WL 1715166 (W. Va. Apr. 22, 2024). Upon consideration of the record and briefs, we find no reversible error and therefore summarily affirm. See W. Va. R. App. P. 21(c).

Affirmed.

ISSUED: September 23, 2024 1 The petitioner is represented by counsel Reginald D. Henry and Lori J. Withrow, and the respondent is represented by counsel Sean Harter. 1 CONCURRED IN BY:

Chief Justice Tim Armstead Justice Elizabeth D. Walker Justice John A. Hutchison Justice William R. Wooton Justice C. Haley Bunn

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Marion D. Helmandollar v. Blackhawk Mining, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marion-d-helmandollar-v-blackhawk-mining-llc-wva-2024.