Marion County v. Woulard

77 Miss. 343
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1899·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Whith'ield, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is not á hint in the record that this claim against the .county was ever presented to the board of supervisors for allowance. Such presentation is a condition precedent to the right to sue. Code of 1892, §§ 79, 320, and especially § 292, and authorities thereunder.

Nor was there any contract made on the minutes of the board. Bridges v. Supervisors, 58 Miss., 817. Nor was there on the said minutes any order “establishing local quarantine,” nor any prescribing “reasonable rules and regulations” to “enforce” the same, as contemplated by § 2278, code of 1892.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marion County v. Woulard, 77 Miss. 343 (Mich. 1899).

77 Miss. 343 (Marion County v. Woulard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richardson v. Canton Farm Equipment, Inc.
608 So. 2d 1240 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1992)
Lamar County v. Tally
77 So. 299 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1917)
Gilchrist-Fordney Co. v. Keyes
74 So. 619 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1917)
Westbrook v. Board of Supervisors
1 Miss. Dec. 203 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1884)