Marion County v. Stanfield

Supreme Court of Iowa

Marion County v. Stanfield

8 Iowa 406

CourtSupreme Court of Iowa

DecidedJune 7, 1859

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 8 Iowa 406 (Marion County v. Stanfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marion County v. Stanfield, 8 Iowa 406 (iowa 1859).

Pincite

Opinion

Wright, C. J.

An affidavit of one of the defendants and appellants, accompanies the notice of appeal to the clerk and appellee, to the effect that he served the same by reading, &c., on a day named. It is objected, and we think properly, that such notice cannot be served, and the proof thereof made by the party appealing. Appellants do not claim that such service would be good, independent of the Code. That it is not authorized by anything found therein, is evident, as we think, from the following sections: 1732, 2428, 1974, 2493 to 2499 inclusive.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright, C. J.

An affidavit of one of the defendants and appellants, accompanies the notice of appeal to the clerk and appellee, to the effect that he served the same by reading, &c., on a day named. It is objected, and we think properly, that such notice cannot be served, and the proof thereof made by the party appealing. Appellants do not claim that such service would be good, independent of the Code. That it is not authorized by anything found therein, is evident, as we think, from the following sections: 1732, 2428, 1974, 2493 to 2499 inclusive.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Iowa 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marion-county-v-stanfield-iowa-1859.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack