Marion County v. Ray

144 So. 845, 107 Fla. 124
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 22, 1932·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed without prejudice to the rights of the parties with reference to the title of the locus in quo.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and 'Whitfield, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marion County v. Ray, 144 So. 845, 107 Fla. 124 (Fla. 1932).

144 So. 845 (Marion County v. Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Power Corporation v. McNeely
125 So. 2d 311 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Lorenz v. City of Hollywood
198 So. 17 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Ray v. Marion County
71 F.2d 509 (Fifth Circuit, 1934)