Marion Center National Bank v. Creswell
This text of 100 A. 456 (Marion Center National Bank v. Creswell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The facts in this case appear in the opinion of the court below dismissing the proceeding instituted by the appellant. When John Creswell directed that at the death of his wife, the appellee, “all these possessions” should go to his son, he expressed a clear intention that she was to take but a life estate in what he gave her in the preceding 'provisions of the will. This was the correct view of the learned president judge of the court below, and, on his opinion, holding that the appellee did not have a fee in the land purchased by the appellant at sheriff’s sale, its appeal is dismissed at its costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 A. 456, 255 Pa. 545, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marion-center-national-bank-v-creswell-pa-1917.