Marion Briggs v. Orange County Superior Court

873 F.2d 1437, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4217, 1989 WL 37348
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 4, 1989
Docket88-2023
StatusUnpublished

This text of 873 F.2d 1437 (Marion Briggs v. Orange County Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marion Briggs v. Orange County Superior Court, 873 F.2d 1437, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4217, 1989 WL 37348 (4th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

873 F.2d 1437
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Marion BRIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 88-2023.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 19, 1989.
Decided: April 4, 1989.

Marion Briggs, appellant pro se.

Robert Holt Edmunds, Jr. (Office of the United States Attorney), for appellee.

Before WIDENER, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Marion Briggs appeals from the district court's order denying Briggs' petition for removal to federal court of proceedings pending in state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1443. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Briggs v. Orange County Superior Court, CR No. 87-257-01-D (M.D.N.C. December 14, 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively. Briggs' motion for default judgment is denied.

AFFIRMED.

*

We note that Briggs was not entitled to removal under subsection 2 of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1443. That subsection only applies to federal officiers "and to persons assisting such officers in the performance of their official duties." North Carolina v. Grant, 452 F.2d 780, 782 (4th Cir.1972) (quoting Greenwood v. Peacock, 384 U.S. 808, 815 (1966))

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
873 F.2d 1437, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4217, 1989 WL 37348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marion-briggs-v-orange-county-superior-court-ca4-1989.