Mario Whitaker v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 7, 2023
DocketA24A0076
StatusPublished

This text of Mario Whitaker v. State (Mario Whitaker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mario Whitaker v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ September 07, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A0076. MARIO WHITAKER v. THE STATE.

In 2006, Mario Whitaker entered a guilty plea to voluntary manslaughter, armed robbery, and aggravated assault. The trial court imposed a total sentence of life imprisonment. Whitaker filed a motion to vacate void sentence in September 2021, which the trial court dismissed on November 4, 2021. Whitaker thereafter filed three other motions, arguing that the indictment was “void and defective,” the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over him because he was not properly served, and his trial counsel was ineffective. On March 7, 2022, the trial court entered an order dismissing the three motions on the basis that Whitaker failed to make a cognizable claim that his sentence was void. Whitaker filed this appeal on April 27, 2022. The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, arguing that we lack jurisdiction because the appeal is untimely. We agree. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of an appealable order or judgment. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon an appellate court. Couch v. United Paperworkers Intl. Union, 224 Ga. App. 721, 721 (482 SE2d 704) (1997). Because Whitaker filed his notice of appeal 51 days after entry of the trial court’s order, this appeal is untimely. In addition, Whitaker’s motions are challenges to the validity of his convictions, and a motion seeking to challenge an allegedly invalid or void judgment of conviction “is not one of the established procedures for challenging the validity of a judgment in a criminal case,” and an appeal from the denial of such a motion is subject to dismissal. Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010). Accordingly, the State’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 09/07/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Couch v. UNITED PAPERWORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION
482 S.E.2d 704 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Roberts v. State
690 S.E.2d 150 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mario Whitaker v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mario-whitaker-v-state-gactapp-2023.