Mario R. Sullivan v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 23, 2022·No. A22A0622·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ May 23, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A0622. MARIO R. SULLIVAN v. THE STATE.

On September 15, 2021, we granted Mario R. Sullivan’s application for discretionary appeal from the trial court’s order denying his motion for an out-of-time appeal. See Sullivan v. State, Case No. A22D0047 (decided September 15, 2021). Our order directed that Sullivan had ten days from the date of the order to file a notice of appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (g). Sullivan filed a notice of appeal on September 28, 2021, which was 13 days after our order was issued. The timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. White v. White, 188 Ga. App. 556, 556 (373 SE2d 824) (1988). Because Sullivan failed to file a notice of appeal within 10 days of our order granting the discretionary application, the notice of appeal is untimely. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See OCGA § 5-6-48 (b) (1); Barnes v. Justis, 223 Ga. App. 671, 671-672 (478 SE2d 402) (1996).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 05/23/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mario R. Sullivan v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2022).

Mario R. Sullivan v. State (Mario R. Sullivan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barnes v. Justis
478 S.E.2d 402 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
White v. White
373 S.E.2d 824 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)