Mario R. Sullivan v. State
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ May 23, 2022
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A22A0622. MARIO R. SULLIVAN v. THE STATE.
On September 15, 2021, we granted Mario R. Sullivan’s application for discretionary appeal from the trial court’s order denying his motion for an out-of-time appeal. See Sullivan v. State, Case No. A22D0047 (decided September 15, 2021). Our order directed that Sullivan had ten days from the date of the order to file a notice of appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (g). Sullivan filed a notice of appeal on September 28, 2021, which was 13 days after our order was issued. The timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. White v. White, 188 Ga. App. 556, 556 (373 SE2d 824) (1988). Because Sullivan failed to file a notice of appeal within 10 days of our order granting the discretionary application, the notice of appeal is untimely. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See OCGA § 5-6-48 (b) (1); Barnes v. Justis, 223 Ga. App. 671, 671-672 (478 SE2d 402) (1996).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 05/23/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mario R. Sullivan v. State (Mario R. Sullivan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.