Mario Obregon v. Stephanie Hollenback

642 F. App'x 285
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 31, 2016
Docket15-7617
StatusUnpublished

This text of 642 F. App'x 285 (Mario Obregon v. Stephanie Hollenback) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mario Obregon v. Stephanie Hollenback, 642 F. App'x 285 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mario Jesus Obregon, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Obregon v. Hollenback, No. 5:15-hc-02098-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
642 F. App'x 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mario-obregon-v-stephanie-hollenback-ca4-2016.