Mario Montez Rogers v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: August 4, 2005
• Docket: 14-05-00183-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 4, 2005

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 4, 2005.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-05-00183-CR

MARIO MONTEZ ROGERS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 337th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 966,813

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a guilty plea to aggravated assault, and the trial court placed him on six years= deferred adjudication community supervision.  Thereafter, the State moved to adjudicate appellant=s guilt, and appellant pleaded true to the allegations in the State=s motion.  The trial court found appellant guilty and assessed eight years= confinement and a $500 fine.  Appellant filed a written notice of appeal. 

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and no motion to review the record or pro se response has been filed.

We agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the State.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed August 4, 2005.

Panel consists of Justices Edelman, Seymore, and Guzman.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).