Mario Lewis v. State
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-13-00275-CR
Mario Lewis, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 68019, THE HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for murder. Appellant’s brief was
due October 24, 2013. The brief has not been received and no extension of time has been requested.
Further, appellant’s court-appointed attorney, E. Wayne Bachus, has not responded to this Court’s
notice that the brief is overdue.
Under these circumstances, we must abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial
court to conduct a hearing in accordance with Rule 38.8 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure to
determine whether appellant wishes to prosecute his appeal and, if so, whether appointed counsel
has abandoned the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). The court shall make appropriate
findings and recommendations. If necessary, the court shall appoint substitute counsel who will
effectively represent appellant in this cause. A record of this hearing, including copies of all findings and any order, shall be forwarded to the Clerk of this Court no later than February 26, 2014. See
Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3).
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose
Abated
Filed: January 28, 2014
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mario Lewis v. State (Mario Lewis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.