Mario J. De Lucia v. State of New Jersey

Third Circuit

Mario J. De Lucia v. State of New Jersey

297 F.2d 228

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedNovember 29, 1961

Docket13691_1

StatusPublished

This text of 297 F.2d 228 (Mario J. De Lucia v. State of New Jersey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mario J. De Lucia v. State of New Jersey, 297 F.2d 228 (3d Cir. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant unsuccessfully applied to the district court for a writ of habeas corpus. The application was made and this appeal taken in forma pauperis, with appellant acting as his own counsel. A review of the record and appellant’s brief discloses material which may have a bearing on the disqualification of a district judge. It does not appear that the matter was brought to the attention of the district court or that it was considered. For this reason, we are vacating the judgment of the district court and remanding for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant unsuccessfully applied to the district court for a writ of habeas corpus. The application was made and this appeal taken in forma pauperis, with appellant acting as his own counsel. A review of the record and appellant’s brief discloses material which may have a bearing on the disqualification of a district judge. It does not appear that the matter was brought to the attention of the district court or that it was considered. For this reason, we are vacating the judgment of the district court and remanding for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

297 F.2d 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mario-j-de-lucia-v-state-of-new-jersey-ca3-1961.